Nokian lukio, Nokia
| Points in quarter | Baskets | Scoring by | Players | Fouls | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teams | PTS Total points scored | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | 1P Free throws made (1-point baskets) | 2P 2-point field goals made | 3P 3-point field goals made | SP Points as starter | BP Points from bench | SPc Players scoring at least 1 point | S10Pc Players scoring at least 10 points | F Fouls |
| Orkesteri | 67 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 4 |
55 82%
|
12 18%
|
6 / 8 | 3 / 8 | 13 |
| TaNMKY II | 97 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 18 | 3 | 29 | 12 |
52 54%
|
45 46%
|
10 / 11 | 6 / 11 | 12 |
| Difference | -30 | -5 | -7 | -8 | -10 | +8 | -7 | -8 | +3 | -33 | -4 | -3 | +1 |
Orkesteri
| # Jersey number | Player | PTS Total points scored | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | 1P Free throws made (1-point baskets) | 2P 2-point field goals made | 3P 3-point field goals made | F Fouls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Suvela, T. ● | 27 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 13 | – | 4 | |
| 4 | Ylivakeri, V. ● | 17 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 4 | – | 3 | |
| 12 | Selin, J. | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | – | – | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| 0 | Hulkkonen, S. ● | 5 | 2 | 3 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | |
| 41 | Schnabel, J. ● | 5 | 3 | – | – | 2 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 8 | Eerilä, J. ● | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | |
| 5 | Niemi, P. | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | |
| 6 | Hinkkanen, K. | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Total | 67 | 22 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 4 | 13 | ||
CoachEerilä, J.
Top performers
Maximum points in game
27
Suvela, T.
Maximum 1P baskets made
9
Ylivakeri, V.
Maximum 2P baskets made
13
Suvela, T.
Maximum 3P baskets made
2
Selin, J.
TaNMKY II
Winner| # Jersey number | Player | PTS Total points scored | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | 1P Free throws made (1-point baskets) | 2P 2-point field goals made | 3P 3-point field goals made | F Fouls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Bergman, R. ● | 19 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 2 | – | 5 | 3 | – | |
| 21 | Lehtinen, R. | 15 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | – | |
| 14 | Korhonen, R. | 12 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | – | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| 49 | Grahn, J. | 11 | 2 | 7 | 2 | – | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| 15 | Pajula, K. ● | 10 | 6 | 2 | – | 2 | – | 5 | – | 4 | |
| 44 | Mäkinen, J. ● | 10 | 2 | – | 5 | 3 | – | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| 50 | Myllymäki, H. ● | 7 | – | 7 | – | – | – | 2 | 1 | – | |
| 20 | Moisio, O. ● | 6 | 4 | – | – | 2 | – | 3 | – | – | |
| 13 | Koivisto, M. | 5 | – | – | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | – | 2 | |
| 7 | Heikkilä, J. | 2 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | |
| 8 | Heiskanen, I. | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | |
| Total | 97 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 18 | 3 | 29 | 12 | 15 | ||
CoachMikkola, T.
Top performers
Maximum points in game
19
Bergman, R.
Maximum 1P baskets made
1
Lehtinen, R.; Grahn, J.; Koivisto, M.
Maximum 2P baskets made
5
Bergman, R.; Pajula, K.
Maximum 3P baskets made
3
Bergman, R.
The game in short
How is this calculated?Odds before the game: Orkesteri 38% – 62% TaNMKY II
- TaNMKY II was the favourite (62%) and won.
Why it went that way
- Threes: TaNMKY II 12 (usual 6.9), Orkesteri 4 (usual 8.2): 28 points of margin for TaNMKY II.
- Suvela T. (Orkesteri): Points 27 (usual 14.7).
Orkesteri · loser
TaNMKY II · winner
Win probability:
Orkesteri
TaNMKY II
