Puisto-Emmaus, Tampere
| Points in quarter | Baskets | Scoring by | Players | Fouls | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teams | PTS Total points scored | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | 1P Free throws made (1-point baskets) | 2P 2-point field goals made | 3P 3-point field goals made | SP Points as starter | BP Points from bench | SPc Players scoring at least 1 point | S10Pc Players scoring at least 10 points | F Fouls |
| TaNMKY II | 63 | 21 | 10 | 13 | 19 |
10
/ 17 59% |
19 | 5 |
51 81%
|
12 19%
|
8 / 9 | 3 / 9 | 17 |
| Rahku | 50 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 10 |
9
/ 12 75% |
10 | 7 |
40 80%
|
10 20%
|
6 / 7 | 3 / 7 | 17 |
| Difference | +13 | +9 | -4 | -1 | +9 | +1 | +9 | -2 | +11 | +2 | +2 | 0 | 0 |
TaNMKY II
Winner| # Jersey number | Player | PTS Total points scored | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | 1P Free throws made (1-point baskets) | 2P 2-point field goals made | 3P 3-point field goals made | F Fouls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | Koski, K. ● | 20 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1 | Jaakkola, S. ● | 12 | 2 | – | 4 | 6 | – | 6 | – | – | |
| 13 | Mononen, M. ● | 11 | 8 | 3 | – | – | – | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 15 | Pajula, K. ● | 5 | 3 | – | – | 2 | – | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
| 32 | Siira, T. | 5 | – | – | – | 5 | 3 | 1 | – | 2 | |
| 45 | Viitanen, J. | 5 | – | 2 | 3 | – | 1 | 2 | – | – | |
| 44 | Mäkinen, J. ● | 3 | – | 1 | 2 | – | 1 | 1 | – | 3 | |
| 21 | Lehtinen, R. | 2 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 1 | – | – | |
| 7 | Heikkilä, J. | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | |
| Total | 63 | 21 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 10 | 19 | 5 | 11 | ||
CoachHeikkilä, J.
Top performers
Maximum points in game
20
Koski, K.
Maximum 1P baskets made
5
Koski, K.
Maximum 2P baskets made
6
Koski, K.; Jaakkola, S.
Maximum 3P baskets made
3
Mononen, M.
Rahku
| # Jersey number | Player | PTS Total points scored | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | 1P Free throws made (1-point baskets) | 2P 2-point field goals made | 3P 3-point field goals made | F Fouls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Penttilä, E. ● | 13 | 4 | 9 | – | – | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | |
| 32 | Niemi, P. ● | 11 | 5 | – | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 23 | Klemetti, J. | 10 | – | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | – | 2 | |
| 22 | Bergman, R. ● | 8 | 3 | – | 3 | 2 | – | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 4 | Mettänen, O. ● | 6 | – | 3 | – | 3 | – | – | 2 | – | |
| 14 | Vienola, T. ● | 2 | – | – | 2 | – | – | 1 | – | 4 | |
| 10 | Sarhela, A. | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | |
| Total | 50 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 17 | ||
CoachPenttilä, E.
Top performers
Maximum points in game
13
Penttilä, E.
Maximum 1P baskets made
4
Niemi, P.; Klemetti, J.
Maximum 2P baskets made
3
Penttilä, E.; Klemetti, J.
Maximum 3P baskets made
2
Penttilä, E.; Bergman, R.; Mettänen, O.
The game in short
How is this calculated?Odds before the game: TaNMKY II 47% – 53% Rahku
- An even match on paper, judging by rosters and recent form.
Why it went that way
- Twos: TaNMKY II 19 (usual 17.8), Rahku 10 (usual 20.6): 23.6 points of margin for TaNMKY II.
- Rahku played without regulars (Mikkola A., Autio H., Holli T.): worth about 6.6 points of margin.
TaNMKY II · winner
Rahku · loser
Win probability:
TaNMKY II
Rahku
